Oct 31

And Forward Two

Posted: under Background.
Tags: ,  October 31st, 2009

Some of you will remember the “Rules of Aare” quoted and discussed extensively in Surrender None.   Some will also remember the various mentions of Old Aare, legends and stories and songs about that mysterious land and the “fall” of Aare that brought the magelords across the sea.   You know it’s across the Immerhoft Sea from Aarenis, and that Aarenis was named for it:  “Daughter of Aare.”

But the deep mysteries of Old Aare are central to the long story arc of this group of books…what happened in Aare has had consquences affecting the entire north as well.    There are a few hints of this in Oath of Fealty, though it’s mostly concerned with the immediate consequences of Kieri’s  move to Lyonya.    More show up in book two.   Paks unwittingly involved herself in the affairs of Aare, elves, dwarves, dragons,  and magelords even before she became a paladin…everyone she touched is changed by that, as well as just her personality and more obvious paladin qualities.

So a lot of questions will be answered, though I can’t promise they all will be (in fact, probably not.  Just the big ones.)

Comments (2)

Jun 02

Food

Posted: under Background, Life beyond writing, the writing life.
Tags: , ,  June 2nd, 2009

Those of you who’ve read Diana Wynne Jones’  The Rough Guide to Fantasyland know that the typical food of fantasyland is stew.  Maybe with bread.  Maybe, if you’re really lucky, bread and cheese both with stew.  Or alternately.

I’m not a foodie (lack the qualifications), but I do like to eat, and when I started writing the Paks books, I didn’t know about the “stew” convention.  Even though there’s some stew, it’s because I felt it fit that location (and pocketbook) and I had great fun inventing other dishes.   Food preferences and eating styles reveal character and offer multiple thorns for plot and character and setting to attach.

Read the rest of this entry »

Comments (36)

Feb 18

Knights

Posted: under Background, Contents.
Tags: ,  February 18th, 2009

The magelords moving north from Old Aare and Aarenis introduced the concept of “knights” to the north.   The Old Humans who lived in the north before the magelords came were not horsemen, though they knew of horses from the horse nomads north of them.

In the present day,  knights as such exist in Fintha, Tsaia, Lyonya, and Prealith.   Most are knighted as part of a specific order (Knights of Gird, Knights of Falk, Knights of the Bells)  but some are battlefield promotions of squires, knighted for deeds of valor.   Any knight may create a knight, though most leave that to the knightly orders. ..in the north, at least.  In Aarenis, knights are created individually more than in orders.  Knights of an order wear insignia indicating the order.

Read the rest of this entry »

Comments (6)

Feb 12

Snippet

Posted: under Background, Contents.
Tags: , , ,  February 12th, 2009

This snippet is the first in the book (in the present version) to resonate with the title Oath of Fealty.    Location: Duke’s Stronghold, shortly after word reaches there  (finally!) that Kieri Phelan is a) the rightful heir to the throne of Lyonya and b) on his way there.    The snippet is in snatches, leaving out bits that aren’t relevant to the title issue.

Arcolin woke to the memory of yesterday’s surprises and the realization that he needed to parade the whole Company.  They had given their oaths to Kieri, who had now left them.  They must now give their oaths to him.

Read the rest of this entry »

Comments (8)

Jan 23

New onsite: People of Paksworld

Posted: under Contents, Website Update.
Tags: , , , , , ,  January 23rd, 2009

Over on the website,  part one of the People section is now up and live.  It covers the basic groups, some of which–elves, dwarves, and gnomes– have been discussed on this blog.   I took out some bits of the blog info as not really necessary, and added some.

Additional groups discussed include the kuaknom/iynisin/dark cousins–those “fallen” elves the others don’t like to mention–and four basic, distinct human lineages: the Old Humans of the north, the magelords who came over the sea from Old Aare to Aarenis (and later, the north), the horse nomads,  and the Seafolk.    The people in the far west, beyond Kolobia, are peripheral enough (so far!) that they’re not being included.

Eventually (but not immediately–need to spend more time on the books proper) there’ll be more background information on specific people–both “current” (in book terms) and historical (ditto), myths and legends, religions, etc.

Comments (3)

Jan 11

Earthfolk: dwarves and gnomes

Posted: under Background.
Tags: , , , ,  January 11th, 2009

I’ve mentioned before a book by one of my college professors, F.S. Lear’s Treason in Roman and Germanic Law. In the course of studying ancient and medieval history, I was dragged (willingly, most of the time, but sometimes dragged) through a lot of legal systems. Lear discusses the contrasting bases for a concept of treason, ultimate disloyalty, under the two systems: one tribal, where loyalty is to a person or tribe and treason is a personal betrayal. The tribal leader in that case cannot be guilty of treason because he (it was always he, then) is the one to whom loyalty is due. The other is formally legal, where loyalty is to a code of law, and anyone–including those at the top–can be guilty of treason if they have transgressed that part of the code.

Relevance to current politics is obvious, but not a topic for this blog, except to show that the same conflicts of concepts exists today, as it did 2000 years ago….and undoubtedly longer ago than that. I grew up on the Border, in an area where a culture that claimed to believe in a rule of law was in daily contact with a culture for whom personal relationships were obviously more important.

All of the history sources I used are relevant to the Paksenarrion universe, but this one, in particular, set the tone for the two types of Earthfolk–dwaves and gnomes– in the books.

Read the rest of this entry »

Comments (4)

Jan 01

O Captain, my Captain…

Posted: under Contents, the writing life.
Tags: , , , ,  January 1st, 2009

The book continues to throw surprises at me, though not fast in the last couple of days as the International Gut Bug has reached our house.   But leaving that unsavory subject aside…it dawned on me last night, working on a scene between Dorrin and some of her cohort, that this continues a conversation begun in the first Paks book, and resulting (ultimately) from a very old schism in human behavior.

What is loyalty?  Who or what can be the object of loyalty?   What are the theoretical and practical and ethical boundaries of loyalty?   Heavy stuff for New Year’s Eve…

Read the rest of this entry »

Comments (3)

Dec 13

A little light reading…

Posted: under Contents, the writing life.
Tags: ,  December 13th, 2008

Paksenarrion’s fictional world has its roots in a World History class I took one summer in junior high (opening space to take Latin the following year).  Until then, I thought of history (“Social Studies” in our school) as a mass of facts to be memorized for a test.   The classes were boring, mostly spent reading aloud, one paragraph per student, the day’s reading assignment, or doing homework–the questions at the end of each chapter.  Aside from my mother’s historical novels (by Daphne du Maurier, Samuel Shellabarger, Kenneth Roberts) that I plowed through during vacation for something to read, I had no great opinion of history.

Our summer school teacher was the curriculum director for the district, newly hired, and he presented hist history in a very different way–more like a college class.  He expected us to read our assignments independently (the tests caught those who hadn’t) and spent the class periods in lecture and discussion.  Suddenly history had multiple dimensions–the stick figures of the “memorize facts” versions became real  people, with real problems and real ideas and real emotions.   Colors, sounds, smells, movement…and obvious relevance to the people around us, the world in the daily news, the results of all that history still alive and scheming/loving/fighting every day.

Still, I was fixated on science in those days, until it became necessary for me to “reconsider [my] educational objectives” as the notice telling me my grades the first year of college were below acceptable.   I had done reasonably well in only two courses, English and History.  I chose to major in History instead of Physics (sigh…)  and spent the rest of that college degree under the guidance of two excellent professors with somewhat different emphasis.

Katherine F. Drew, then chair of the history department at Rice, was a medievalist who had translated several legal codes (if you can find her Lombard Laws and The Burgundian Code, you’ll find familiar bits in the Code of Gird) and she insisted on the importance of everything–including economics.   I had studied some military history on my own (thanks to that Latin class and Caesar’s Gallic Wars) and thought economics both impenetrable and dull until she nudged us into making the connection between the finances and the strategy, the political structure and the ways goods and services were exchanged.

Floyd S. Lear, then professor emeritus, led us  into the background of the politics on the philosophical side (he taught both history classes and humanities classes) in both ancient and medieval history.  I have, and used in the Paks world books, his Treason in Roman and Germanic Law, a book that underlies my conception of gnome and dwarf societies in this fictional universe.  Both these professors demonstrated–and demanded–a high level of scholarship.  To put it bluntly, we learned to distinguish good sources from bad, one of the most valuable lessons anyone can learn.

As I was graduating from Rice, Dr. Drew said something that affected my life–she commented one day that when visiting the homes of former students, she was saddened when a bookcase held the college texts and no new evidence of continued learning.   I don’t  know how the others took it, but my response was to set up a long-term course of study–less demanding than college itself, since I’d have a day job, but intellectually challenging at the same level.   One subject to review, one new one, one new practical skill.

It’s been a lot of fun for the past forty years.  I’m still reading history books (and re-reading them), most recently Braudel’s big fat books on economics & history in the Renaissance.   But not just history–many other areas of nonfiction as well.   And as a background for writing fiction–especially fantasy–all this reading in history, cultural anthropology, and so on has proven invaluable.  So also the practical skills–hiking, camping, basic cooking, basic sewing,  riding and caring for horses, work with cattle,  butchering, building, emergency medical care, rural health care, gardening, using historical  tools like scythe and sickle–and so on.   All of it makes possible the kind of textured fiction I hope to write.   (It can also  result in large lumps of “I did all this research and you’re going to read it or else!”  I do try not to let my enthusiasm for the details to overwhelm the book. )

Comments (3)