Need Some Help: Contest Related

Posted: January 5th, 2013 under contest, Reader Help.
Tags: ,

In case no one’s checking the comments in the contest thread…I’ve now read everything and made what I hope is an accurate list of unique contributors.

But, given that I’ve been sick and foggy-headed, I’d like someone else to count that too.  I get thirty unique contributors…is that what y’all think?    Once I have a check on the number, I can run the random number app and have a winner.

BTW…great entries.  I was so smart not to think I could pick a winner on merit because there were too many really good ones!


  • Comment by iphinome — January 6, 2013 @ 3:12 am


    01 Jet
    02 Sharidann
    03 Leo
    04 Rowanmdm
    05 Kerry aka Trouble
    06 Dave Ring
    07 Tuttle
    08 Jenn
    09 patrick
    11 Patrick Doris
    12 Amy
    13 Thae
    14 Susan
    15 Annabel
    16 GinnyW
    17 june Matte
    18 Kristin
    19 Daniel Glover
    20 pjm
    21 Tracy
    22 Tina Black
    23 Kevin Steverson
    24 Abigail Miller
    25 Eowyn
    26 Jeanine
    27 Jim Elgar
    28 Gareth
    29 Linda
    30 Lise

    If you have a secret gamer past, roll you d30.

  • Comment by Kerry aka Trouble — January 6, 2013 @ 6:34 am


    I agree with this list except I might have counted iphinome’s couplet, but since she obviously isn’t counting it as an entry, then 30 it is.

  • Comment by Richard — January 6, 2013 @ 6:38 am


    yes to all of @Iphinome’s 30; and though she said she isn’t entering herself, look at her couplet and I think you’ll agree it does qualify (no Muppets fan deserves to be excluded), which will make it 31.

  • Comment by Sharidann — January 6, 2013 @ 2:49 pm


    I don’t have a secret gamer past, just never had a d30… 🙂


    But never D30… —>> n00b 🙁

  • Comment by iphinome — January 6, 2013 @ 4:41 pm


    @Kerri and Richard I did not enter the contest.

  • Comment by elizabeth — January 6, 2013 @ 9:30 pm


    Because iphinome is adamant that she did not enter the contest (and I’m not into forcing people), her entry was not considered.

    The random number generator thingie has spoken, though I stared at the result for a long, long moment (seriously? THAT number?) and it had nothing to do with the quality of the entry associated with the number.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment