{"id":1190,"date":"2011-05-04T09:49:03","date_gmt":"2011-05-04T15:49:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.paksworld.com\/blog\/?p=1190"},"modified":"2011-05-04T09:49:03","modified_gmt":"2011-05-04T15:49:03","slug":"clear-as-mud","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.paksworld.com\/blog\/?p=1190","title":{"rendered":"Clear As Mud"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>So as I&#8217;m slogging, lurching, struggling through the mental swamp that is this part of Book IV,\u00a0 I realize that what keeps tripping me up is the E subplot.\u00a0 (As opposed to A, B, C, and D.)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 What the heck is going on with E-subplot (or, to shorten things, Eplot.<\/p>\n<p><!--more-->As usual, now that I&#8217;m more than a book ahead of you, I can&#8217;t tell you what Eplot is about and ask for help or anything.\u00a0\u00a0 Eplot has its roots way, way back&#8211;it&#8217;s part of the Old Stuff that&#8217;s coming boiling up in the new group of books.\u00a0\u00a0 I have the feeling (or maybe blind hope) that if I can get Eplot sorted, everything else will unkink and line out at a nice brisk trot.\u00a0\u00a0 Right now, the characters who (present day) are dealing with elements of Eplot want to infodump\u00a0 and tell me (and you) all about it.\u00a0\u00a0 I need to know; you don&#8217;t.\u00a0 Or at least, you don&#8217;t need to know about it in the sort of plot malfeasance that occurred in one mystery I read (and consider this instance a perfect example of how not to impart information)&#8230;the protagonist, galloping full speed towards the now-discovered murderer who was galloping full speed away,\u00a0 starts lecturing the reader on how the height of horses is measured.<\/p>\n<p>So in the midst of other things going on, I won&#8217;t let my character suddenly give you a thousand years of history in a very large nutshell.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 And you should be very, very glad.\u00a0 Because even the best, most interesting and active characters, aren&#8217;t interesting when they become mouthpieces for the writer trying to figure out who did what to whom when and why it matters now.<\/p>\n<p>Unfortunately (and it is unfortunate) I have to write, and then read, the lecture(s) so that I can then use them in writing the actual story.\u00a0 If it really turns out that Deceased A and Live B had a child C who, though now Deceased, fathered D, I will be very annoyed with them for not telling me that earlier. \u00a0 Since A and B quarreled before A died (why did they quarrel???)\u00a0 there&#8217;s the question of why C was hanging around A, esp. as A didn&#8217;t much like C. \u00a0\u00a0 But if C wasn&#8217;t A and B&#8217;s child,\u00a0 and was only B&#8217;s child, that makes &#8220;why was C hanging around A even more important.<\/p>\n<p>At the moment, I can trace only three of A&#8217;s children for sure.\u00a0\u00a0 Two are dead, and only one (of the dead ones) had children.\u00a0\u00a0 If A and B were C&#8217;s parents, then C had children too.\u00a0\u00a0 (Yes, scribbly charts on cards and random pieces of paper have been done, scratched out, done again.)\u00a0\u00a0 In one sense, it would be tidy for A and B to be C&#8217;s parents, and tidy in a different way for B to be C&#8217;s parent (but not A) but is it real?\u00a0\u00a0 Feeling my way back alone the connections among people alive generations ago is&#8230;tricky.\u00a0\u00a0 The conscious plotter (as opposed to the Plot Daemon, who&#8217;s presently sound asleep and snoring loudly to prove it)\u00a0 is apt to go for &#8220;Oh, way cool idea!&#8221; and not some deeper truth.<\/p>\n<p>So here I am, muddy and sweaty and very tired of the swamp, but still clinging to the line of Eplot until I find its source and trace its course.\u00a0\u00a0 Meanwhile, over on Cplot, someone&#8217;s jumping up and down and wanting to tell me something, but he&#8217;ll have to wait.\u00a0 All this stuff has to connect at the end, in the right way&#8230;so slogging is necessary now.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>So as I&#8217;m slogging, lurching, struggling through the mental swamp that is this part of Book IV,\u00a0 I realize that what keeps tripping me up is the E subplot.\u00a0 (As opposed to A, B, C, and D.)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 What the heck is going on with E-subplot (or, to shorten things, Eplot.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[29,5],"tags":[108,22,20,107],"class_list":["post-1190","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-background","category-the-writing-life","tag-background","tag-characters","tag-progress-report","tag-the-writing-life"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.paksworld.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1190"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.paksworld.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.paksworld.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.paksworld.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.paksworld.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1190"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/www.paksworld.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1190\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1192,"href":"http:\/\/www.paksworld.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1190\/revisions\/1192"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.paksworld.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1190"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.paksworld.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1190"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.paksworld.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1190"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}